Feature Requests

Please check out the following guidelines before suggesting a feature! Off-topic posts will be deleted.
Please add “Smartphone View Restricted” as a middle-ground moderation step instead of full deletion
Different platforms have varying levels of content regulation. Smartphone platforms in particular often require stricter compliance due to app store policies. If VRChat applies a single strict standard across all platforms to meet these requirements, it can result in excessive restrictions for users accessing content via PC and VR. Japan’s video service Nico Nico Douga (Niconico) has handled this issue effectively by implementing an intermediate moderation option: marking certain content as “Smartphone App View Restricted”. This allows the service to comply with smartphone platform requirements while keeping the content available for users on PC and other platforms. We believe VRChat would also benefit from introducing a similar “Smartphone View Restricted” tier. This would provide a more nuanced approach than immediately deleting content entirely, resulting in fairer and more creator-friendly moderation. プラットフォームによって、コンテンツに関する規制の基準は異なります。特にスマートフォンプラットフォームでは、アプリストアのポリシーに合わせた対応が求められるケースが多くあります。 そのため、VRChatが全プラットフォームで一律に厳しい基準を適用すると、PCやVRからアクセスするユーザーにとっては過剰な規制を感じる結果になりやすいと考えられます。 日本の動画サービスニコニコ動画では、この課題に対して「スマートフォンアプリからの閲覧禁止」という中間的な対応を上手く取り入れています。これにより、スマートフォン向けの規制に適応しつつ、PCなど他の環境ではコンテンツをそのまま提供し続けています。 VRChatにもぜひ同様の「スマートフォン閲覧禁止」という段階的なモデレーション機能を導入していただきたいです。いきなり完全削除するのではなく、より柔軟で現実的な運用が可能になると思います。
1
18+ gated Worlds and Avatars with verified-only visibilty for the Adult Communities
Currently we have the choice between Public or Private worlds and avatars. Everything that is private is hidden and inaccessible. - As an artist, noone would find your private content if you have no direct link. - Private avatars can't be used from other players. Of course it makes sense that you can't access other people's avatars, that were meant to represent JUST them. But commissioned avatars can't be NSFW, otherwise it would be against TOS, if they'd just be uploaded publicly by the artist. - With millions of avatars the mod team can't go through every single one and I sometimes ran into clearly public NSFW uploads in avatar search worlds. - Private worlds can't be saved to favorites without programs like VRCX, making them even harder to find. - But also some creators are giving access to kinky private worlds via link and everyone can get into that world via said link. So even non-verified people would roam around NSFW worlds, but noone would even notice. But why not using the exising 18+ verified badge for worlds and avatars similiar to how it is already used for accessing instances? I already see request-only groups in which you're not accepted, if not age-verified. And instances being age gated to allow kinky communities to not be hidden in private and to be legal. I recommend a similar step for Worlds and Avatars. + All the points above would not be a problem, if we would have a third category for both avatars and worlds -> [18+]. + Every not verified person could not wear such an avatar. + Every not verified person would see such an avatar as a robot, not showing them. + Every not verified person could not join any instance to such a world, even when having the link from chats they shouldn't roam in. + 18+ Worlds and Avatars could even be invisible and not listed for not verified people. + Artists would not have to hide their content anymore, never to be seen from anyone. + Noone have to deal with very unhandy downsides anymore, like being unable to favorite private worlds or can't upload NSFW avatars publicly for friends or customers. It would give a safespace for not just the many kinky bubbles out there, but also for the masses of vanilla NSFW people, who're searching for communities, that're not nearly invisible. I think age verification will spread much more with such an update. > Why even bother? Recently I received many messages of friends who uploaded teasy worlds or ran teasy groups and meetups. VRC is not just used by minors. Those friends were temp-banned and their groups and worlds deleted. Sometimes content that was uploaded for 5 years to the public and people had nice memories there. Worlds with 100s of thousands of visits and thousands of favorite entries. The need for such worlds and groups is obvious. It also often isn't obvious why. Those groups or worlds had no naked characters in them, but instead kink groups and worlds with suggestive content, that they were into. People in my bubbles starting to be confused about what's okay and what not anymore. Especially because there is no warning, no 'set to private until review', just deletion and temp-ban. And the explanation mail always just states 'against our guidelines.' Yeah which of those exactly and what detail in that world was too much? People can't really learn from that, just repeating what they're always doing and running into the same problem again. VRC mods being stricter to keep the public free of any lewd content? Okay, but then give us a red-light district at the harbor. If there was an 18+ option for worlds, every kink content creator automatically categorized their work there, to be safe but not longer hidden. So many users would have reason to breathe a sigh of relief, and your mod team would be way less in stress. VRC itself stated "Let adults be adults." Yes, give us places that're gated by a bouncer checking your ID, not just tolerating hidden blackmarkets that're accessible through a hole close to the sewers.
53
Age verification, Adult spaces, Ban waves & NSFW content
Feature Requests, Age Verified 18+ only, worlds; if you are not verified you cant join or open an instance of a world listed 18+ Age Verified 18+ only, Groups; A group setting allowing you to set it to 18+ only, for players who aren't verified the banner, posts, description, rules ect. should be empty or have the placeholder "planet" banner. Age Verified 18+ only, User profiles; I want to have funny adult jokes in my bio, I cant rn. status, pronounce, icon, picture & bio. Profiles set to be 18+ should appear empty & have basic placeholder or default pictures. Age Verified 18+ only, Stickers/Prints; A verified account should be able to select an 18+ tag during the uploading of a sticker/print, making it only visibel to other 18+ verified players. Age Verified 18+ only, Avatars; The ability to set an avatar to 18+ during or after upload, 18+ avatars should not load in when used in a 18+ group instance or world. 18+ avatars should be hidden or shown as a fall back when using content gating while inside of an 18+ group instance or world. I wasn't sure if I should even be posting this because I felt like there are so many other requests about 18+ avatars and groups, I felt like I had something to add that I didn't see in other requests and felt like grouping everything together was the right idea, especially since the most active posts are posted on 2019 and felt outdated. If you agree with me pls upvote, have anything else to add? any concerns or questions please comment below. Thank you!
15
Moderation Details for Users
If a user get sanctioned and their content deleted, both sides want to prevent that happening again. The user wants to stay connected to friends and not losing creative work to the void and VRC doesn't wanna need to go after all those reports and cause bad vibes. But there is one detail missing, that I heard multiple times during the current ban waves: A user report. If an avatar, world or something else is reported and the author banned, the author usually gets a random "because our guidelines" mail, showing how long the saction will last and which world or avatar was deleted. But the user still not knows what detail was the crossing-line factor. The guidelines contain vague spots, while stating any sexual content as NSFW and so not suited for public spaces, many people create content in the kink/fetish spectrum, often containing everyday's life stuff, that usually never would be banned. But during the last weeks such content often was flagged by very diligent people and a ton of worlds were deleted. A world can be huge, containing lots and lots of things. If the user doesn't know what to prevent in future, then similar stuff will be uploaded and the whole thing happens again. It would be super helpful for sanctioned users, if the mod-mail would contain a short report about why this action was done and what part was violating which singular point of the TOS. If a user puts weeks of creative work into a world, then a moderator should at least take 5 minutes to explain the deletion.
0
Load More