Add "Contains Generative AI Content" tag to the Content Gating system
~Nanochip
With the wave of generative AI content used throughout games/platforms that run on user-generated content such as VRChat, it should be required that creators tag their avatars & worlds appropriately with "Contains Generative AI Content" when the avatar/world contains ANY generative AI assets/content.
The goal is so that users who do not wish to see such content, can filter it out through VRChat's native Content Gating system.
Screenshot below as an example.
Photo Viewer
View photos in a modal
Log In
Ekso
We needed this months ago. We need it more now
Chdata
Hell yea brotha
SekoPuppy
This is a vital addition for the health of the platform. Without it, more and more worlds look like Roblox-tier slop, especially now that there are monetisation routes and the usual suspects are beginning to take notice.
Uzer Tekton
AI slop-generated VR environments are harmful because they create the feeling of a world without actually creating one. Many of these environments look impressive at first — huge landscapes, futuristic cities, fantasy rooms — but often feel empty. They are built from visual patterns instead of real design choices, creating strange layouts, meaningless details, and spaces that look interesting but have no purpose.
On the other hand, a good virtual world feels like someone thought about how people will move through it, what stories it tells, and what emotions it should create. In contrast, AI slop environments can feel like walking through a dream made from random images: visually impressive, but with nothing meaningful underneath.
The problem is not AI being used as a tool. The problem is flooding VR with endless, disposable spaces that replace creativity with generation. When anyone can instantly create thousands of environments without real thought behind them, carefully made worlds become harder to discover. Creators who spend months building detailed spaces and meaningful experiences must compete with a constant stream of automatically generated content.
This hurts the VR community because virtual worlds are not just images — they are places where people gather, create memories, and express themselves. If VR becomes filled with random AI-generated environments designed only to look impressive for a few seconds, it risks becoming a collection of empty backdrops instead of a place for creativity and human connection.
To protect VR creativity, platforms should limit AI slop instead of allowing it to overwhelm communities. AI-generated environments should be clearly labeled, low-effort mass uploads should be restricted, and discovery systems should prioritize projects made with real creative effort. Users should also have the option to filter out AI-generated environments if they want a more human-made experience.
AI should be labeled and can be opted out for users who prefer human-created spaces. Transparency lets people choose what they explore and understand whether a world was carefully designed by a creator or mainly generated by AI.
AI can be a powerful tool for helping creators, but it should support human creativity rather than replace it. The future of VR should not be endless machine-generated spaces, but worlds built with purpose, imagination, and human connection.
Message written with GPT and real human sentiment
M0dZ_
Uzer Tekton have you lost your ability to write? Everyone knows generative AI is bad but using AI to write your reply just makes it worse lmao
Uzer Tekton
M0dZ_ The next time you ride in a car, "have you lost your ability to walk?"
M0dZ_
Uzer Tekton at least I have a drivers license, some people use self driving cars :)
Horrible analogy btw
Uzer Tekton
M0dZ_ Next time you use google, "have you lost your ability to think?"
Tathurai (タスライ)
Uzer Tekton You've used two false analogy logical fallacies in your replies to M0dZ_.
If you want to express 'real human sentiment', don't use generative AI when doing so.
Maebbie
Related video from the EU Commission just dropped. Will Social VR Platforms have to comply here? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Xtd8vhytuo
Uzer Tekton
This may be the key
Uzer Tekton
Sadly probably not legally applicable
> Minimal or no risk
> The AI Act does not introduce rules for AI that is deemed minimal or no risk. The vast majority of AI systems currently used in the EU fall into this category. This includes applications such as AI-enabled video games or spam filters.
However, there is clear demand for transparency, regardless of the law. It is a matter of retaining community trust and UGC health. We need AI content labelled and option to opt-out.
ElfMom
PLEASE.
While we're at it, let's add a category to the report world feature for "misleading preview" .
I am so tired of ai slop world preview icons that in no way shape or form reflect the actual world. It's one thing to make a fanciful "title card" type preview, but I have seen so many that just use an ai imageof what I assume they
wish
the map looked like, and then the map looks nothing like that.PDB
how did you find the characted use by vrchat? i need that
BinoWulf
I would even go further than this. I would just make the system more dynamic and you can choose the tags you want to remove, worlds and avatar have user generated tags for such a long time and never gets used anywhere, I wish that I could just add tags that I don't want to see.
The current world and avatar search lacks a lot on functionality...
Ryley_Oleander
i really want this so tired of ai
Kizzy
Kind of funny that a lot of the people who are against the idea of this tag and defend the use of AI in this comment section can't even be bothered to write their own thoughts. They're clearly having AI write the posts for them, the poster below me even admitted to it lol.
Load More
→