Feature Requests

With the "automatic invites" feature, we seriously need the ability to make the group "open invite" with the "18+ age verified only" toggle available.

I would like to see the existing OSC Menu to be migrated over to the Debug Menu. I believe the new framework would allow for better readability, easier debugging, and improved filtering of the display. I believe this will solve: Consistent location for debugging (one panel vs two) Refresh the UI to not be a terminal experience Improve user readability Improve the VR and Desktop experience Improve Branding consistency by adopting new debug theming/design I would like to see: Filtering/Searching of different data types depending on the context. (Int,Bool,Float) Option to switch to the display to/from Graph and Table mode. Table mode only showing the current value. Be able to see attached clients, port, the requests/sec, and possibly a toggle to see what endpoints they are calling. See what OSC endpoints are exposed on my avatar who is altering that data. Also potentially a log to mark transactions between applications. I've attached an example of what I roughly conceptualize for this type of menu.

I would like to see the existing Avatar Menu to be migrated over to the Debug Menu. I believe the new framework would allow for better readability, easier debugging, and improved filtering of the display. I believe this will solve: Consistent location for debugging (one panel vs two) Refresh the UI to not be a terminal experience Improve user readability Improve the VR and Desktop experience Improve Branding consistency by adopting new debug theming/design I would like to see: Filtering/Searching of different data types depending on the context. (Int,Bool,Tracking/Not Tracking, ETC) Pinning of value so it can present on one panel all together. This would be the equivalent of a watch menu inside an IDE. I've attached an example of what I roughly conceptualize for this type of menu.

It would be great to have a thumbs up, thumbs down system for worlds. A five star ranking system. Lately a lot of unfinished worlds have leaked into the game and more often than not with my friends I find myself checking out like 4 different worlds before we find something we like. It's a huge waste of time. It would be great to have the ability to rank worlds, having a top rated tab. So that way we can filter out maps that are low quality. A plus would be being able to write a review for a world as well.

Currently, EAC blocks VRChat access on Cloud-based PC services, Macs, VPNs, older but otherwise possibly capable hardware and pretty much anything involving a Virtual Machine. This scope has only expanded over time, reducing the ways that players can access VRChat, and this seems like the opposite of what any platform would want. Surely, there are better systems for securing what needs to be secured here without eliminating access options. Especially with current conditions making the singular EAC-allowed PC option more expensive. Even though it’s just anecdote, most of the people I know that aren’t on VRChat but know about it gave up because they cant run it on their Mac or a Virtual/Cloud PC. It’s such a common occurrence that if someone is in the same social circles as VRC users, you can pretty much guess why they themselves are not. It’s always EAC having taken their options away.

Had 2 options when selecting to vote kick. Reason 1 - Nuisance Reason 2 - AFK Nuisance reason will be a bad strike on safety system. AFK reason will not effect the status of the player. Simply allows to kick someone who has either gone extended AFK or Sleep.

We would like to have some kind of better official method for ET/FT that receives OSC from VRCFT, etc. The facial tracking add-on created by the user community achieves excellent quality, but it causes significant CPU frame time performance issue due to running complex animator processing such as bit compression and smoothing of synced expression parameters. An animator-driven ET/FT requires building a large-scale direct blend tree for optimization, demanding advanced technical skills, which is also a problem. One possible solution is to extend the official ET/FT features to the Avatar Descriptor.

I'm sure a lot of us who in here deals with this issue and it's very annoying to track quickly or find out who's avatar is emitting global audio sound or other audio sounds. It would be a nice addition to VRC itself, as well as moderation to have a way to find out which users are emitting Avatar Sounds or Global Audio sounds and not having to turn/off every avatar in an instance which can be quite tedious and time consuming. Excuse my Microsoft paint Drawing skill, but it would be nice to have it in the 'Instance' Tab, as that's where I and I think most of us look for people talking/playing audio to disrupt other issues, especially when they're hiding in meshes. The blue (Which we already have) shows Voice being transmitted, the red on the right would indicate if an user is emitting Avatar Audio the left when Voice is transmitted.

This feature request is asking for the ability to upload a secondary "optimized" version of an avatar to the same blueprint ID. Description: Users can already upload their own fallback avatars and even generate impostors, but what if I had a "Very Poor" avatar with a "Medium or better" version? This would mean that I could upload an "unoptimized" version of my avatar with all the bells and whistles, but then I could also upload a Medium or Good version of the avatar that people can opt to see instead of my slower avatar. Technical Details: In the VRCSDK, the user would have an option to upload a "medium or better" version of their avatar on the same blueprint ID. Considers the performance after optimization scripts run. Inherits the existing avatar show system (show, hide, shield), where shield would likely show the Medium or better version if they are hiding Poor/Very Poor. Benefits: Overall instance performance can remain good without needing to hide most avatars. Creates a stronger market for "optimized avatars" or avatar optimization tooling. Improves immersion since you can see more avatars as intended. Has the same drawback as impostors (mismatched state), except it's likely more accurate. Users wouldn't need to change avatars as often, since they can already be in their "event" avatar. It's like the fallback system, but per avatar. Drawbacks: More storage required on VRC's end. Still a chance of avatar state mismatch. Would probably be best combined with a "temporary show" feature for avatars Fallbacks and Imposters already exist which may disincentivize the feature from being made

Let us pick a portal skin during instance creation specifically for that one instance. This has also positive effect on increasing awareness about the feature.