[1761] Separate "Mutuals" into two distinct categories: Mutual Friends and Mutual Groups
tracked
Felinusfish
There is a major UX discrepancy in describing something as "Mutuals" without distinguishing Groups and Friends into two distinct categories. Without the distinction, people immediately assume the term "Mutuals" refers to individuals, as opposed to BOTH individuals and groups. These should be separated to avoid confusion, or the 'Mutuals" are should be renamed to something better suited. Unfortunately, I don't know anything short and sweet, but it may be better to just name it something closer to "Relations" instead.
Log In
Deantwo
Maybe also just exclude some groups from the mutuals count?
Seeing that I have 2 groups in common with someone, and those two groups being "Open Beta" and "Trans" isn't going to mean I have any sort of a connection with them.
Maybe just groups with more than a few thousand members shouldn't be counted as having a connection when showing the icon on the nameplates?
Tupper - VRChat Head of Community
marked this post as
tracked
Artic-
The mutual friends count has SIGNIFICANTLY more social weight, as opposed to common groups. To me at least.
I would prefer the nameplate to show the friend count distinctly from the groups. Or, better, to not show the group count on the nameplate at all
Lunarfox 月狐
When you scroll to the very bottom, the bottommost player's profile picture will be slightly cut off.
Patroll
At very least add it here:
Felinusfish
Excuse the shoddy work, but I imagine something like this would work significantly better. Having the "All Friends" icon used to notate the mutual friends, and the groups symbol annotating your mutual groups would provide significant clarity for most users on the platform.
Entorix
I think something like this could be the way to go
Haxy
Entorix much better
Deantwo
Entorix, Would be nice. And it could just open up the Groups tab instead when you click the "Mutual Groups" button, since that page already had the list of mutual groups.